| Title |
Inorganic Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-010-0318-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanjib Bhattacharyya, Rachel A. Kudgus, Resham Bhattacharya, Priyabrata Mukherjee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 404 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 14% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 58 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 76 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 9% |
| Engineering | 31 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 105 | 25% |
| Unknown | 96 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,782,945
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#258
of 3,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,757
of 191,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.