↓ Skip to main content

Osteoarthritis Index delivered by mobile phone (m-WOMAC) is valid, reliable, and responsive

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteoarthritis Index delivered by mobile phone (m-WOMAC) is valid, reliable, and responsive
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, July 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Bellamy, Cecilia Wilson, Joan Hendrikz, Sarah L. Whitehouse, Bipin Patel, Simon Dennison, Tim Davis, EDC Study Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Psychology 9 5%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 50 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,417,962
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#902
of 4,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,829
of 104,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.