↓ Skip to main content

Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penelope A Lynch, Uwe Grimm, Matthew B Thomas, Andrew F Read

Abstract

Chemical insecticides against adult mosquitoes are a key element in most malaria management programmes, but their efficacy is threatened by the evolution of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. By killing only older mosquitoes, entomopathogenic fungi can in principle significantly impact parasite transmission while imposing much less selection for resistance. Here an assessment is made as to which of the wide range of possible virulence characteristics for fungal biopesticides best realise this potential.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#19,854,550
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,309
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,621
of 284,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#72
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.