You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nominal and Interactive Groups: Effects of Preinstruction and Deliberations on Decisions and Evidence Recall in Complex Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Psychology, February 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.58 |
| Authors |
Martin J. Bourgeois, Irwin A. Horowitz, Lynne ForsterLee, Jon Grahe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 39% |
| Psychology | 8 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#2,357
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,599
of 77,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.