You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Public engagement with emerging technologies: Does reflective thinking affect survey responses?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1177/09636625211029438 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel P. Carlisle, Pamela M. Feetham, Malcolm J. Wright, Damon A. H. Teagle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
New Zealand | 3 | 33% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 56% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Members of the public | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 30% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 30% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,647,629
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#196
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,964
of 433,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.