You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association study of survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303477 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chen Wu, Peter Kraft, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Emily Steplowski, Michelle Brotzman, Mousheng Xu, Poorva Mudgal, Laufey Amundadottir, Alan A Arslan, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Myron Gross, Kathy Helzlsouer, Eric J Jacobs, Charles Kooperberg, Gloria M Petersen, Wei Zheng, Demetrius Albanes, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Julie E Buring, Federico Canzian, Guangwen Cao, Eric J Duell, Joanne W Elena, J Michael Gaziano, Edward L Giovannucci, Goran Hallmans, Amy Hutchinson, David J Hunter, Mazda Jenab, Guoliang Jiang, Kay-Tee Khaw, Andrea LaCroix, Zhaoshen Li, Julie B Mendelsohn, Salvatore Panico, Alpa V Patel, Zhi Rong Qian, Elio Riboli, Howard Sesso, Hongbing Shen, Xiao-Ou Shu, Anne Tjonneland, Geoffrey S Tobias, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Jarmo Virtamo, Kala Visvanathan, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Chengfeng Wang, Kai Yu, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Stephen Chanock, Robert Hoover, Patricia Hartge, Charles S Fuchs, Dongxin Lin, Brian M Wolpin |
| Abstract |
Survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is limited and few prognostic factors are known. We conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify germline variants associated with survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,156,397
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#5,385
of 6,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,972
of 276,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#30
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.