| Title |
Efficacy and Tolerance of Glatiramer Acid (Copaxone) on Long-Term Use: 10 Years of Experience at the Moscow City Multiple Sclerosis Center
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11055-013-9773-5 |
| Authors |
A. N. Boiko, M. V. Davydovskaya, T. L. Demina, N. Yu. Lashch, V. V. Ovcharov, E. V. Popova, N. F. Popova, A. V. Romashkin, O. V. Boiko, N. V. Khachanova, S. N. Sharanova, S. G. Shchur, E. I. Gusev |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,837
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology
#16
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,163
of 197,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them