↓ Skip to main content

Interspecific Interactions between Primates, Birds, Bats, and Squirrels May Affect Community Composition on Borneo

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Primatology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interspecific Interactions between Primates, Birds, Bats, and Squirrels May Affect Community Composition on Borneo
Published in
American Journal of Primatology, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/ajp.22095
Pubmed ID
Authors

LYDIA BEAUDROT, MATTHEW J. STRUEBIG, ERIK MEIJAARD, SEBASTIANUS VAN BALEN, SIMON HUSSON, CARSON F. YOUNG, ANDREW J. MARSHALL

Abstract

For several decades, primatologists have been interested in understanding how sympatric primate species are able to coexist. Most of our understanding of primate community ecology derives from the assumption that these animals interact predominantly with other primates. In this study, we investigate to what extent multiple community assembly hypotheses consistent with this assumption are supported when tested with communities of primates in isolation versus with communities of primates, birds, bats, and squirrels together. We focus on vertebrate communities on the island of Borneo, where we examine the determinants of presence or absence of species, and how these communities are structured. We test for checkerboard distributions, guild proportionality, and Fox's assembly rule for favored states, and predict that statistical signals reflecting interactions between ecologically similar species will be stronger when nonprimate taxa are included in analyses. We found strong support for checkerboard distributions in several communities, particularly when taxonomic groups were combined, and after controlling for habitat effects. We found evidence of guild proportionality in some communities, but did not find significant support for Fox's assembly rule in any of the communities examined. These results demonstrate the presence of vertebrate community structure that is ecologically determined rather than randomly generated, which is a finding consistent with the interpretation that interactions within and between these taxonomic groups may have shaped species composition in these communities. This research highlights the importance of considering the broader vertebrate communities with which primates co-occur, and so we urge primatologists to explicitly consider nonprimate taxa in the study of primate ecology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 59%
Environmental Science 26 20%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 10 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2012.
All research outputs
#16,711,078
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Primatology
#1,565
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,214
of 286,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Primatology
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.