↓ Skip to main content

Infant Feeding Decision-Making and the Influences of Social Support Persons Among First-Time African American Mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Infant Feeding Decision-Making and the Influences of Social Support Persons Among First-Time African American Mothers
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2167-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ifeyinwa V. Asiodu, Catherine M. Waters, Dawn E. Dailey, Audrey Lyndon

Abstract

Background While breast milk is considered the gold standard of infant feeding, a majority of African American mothers are not exclusively breastfeeding their newborn infants. Objective The overall goal of this critical ethnographic research study was to describe infant feeding perceptions and experiences of African American mothers and their support persons. Methods Twenty-two participants (14 pregnant women and eight support persons) were recruited from public health programs and community based organizations in northern California. Data were collected through field observations, demographic questionnaires, and multiple in-person interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. Results Half of the mothers noted an intention to exclusively breastfeed during the antepartum period. However, few mothers exclusively breastfed during the postpartum period. Many participants expressed guilt and shame for not being able to accomplish their antepartum goals. Life experiences and stressors, lack of breastfeeding role models, limited experiences with breastfeeding and lactation, and changes to the family dynamic played a major role in the infant feeding decision making process and breastfeeding duration. Conclusions for Practice Our observations suggest that while exclusivity goals were not being met, a considerable proportion of African American women were breastfeeding. Future interventions geared towards this population should include social media interventions, messaging around combination feeding, and increased education for identified social support persons. Public health measures aimed at reducing the current infant feeding inequities would benefit by also incorporating more culturally inclusive messaging around breastfeeding and lactation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 271 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 86 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 76 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Social Sciences 23 8%
Psychology 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 100 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#802,365
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#63
of 2,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,429
of 346,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#5
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.