↓ Skip to main content

Managing for RADical ecosystem change: applying the Resist‐Accept‐Direct (RAD) framework

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing for RADical ecosystem change: applying the Resist‐Accept‐Direct (RAD) framework
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/fee.2377
Authors

Abigail J Lynch, Laura M Thompson, Erik A Beever, David N Cole, Augustin C Engman, Cat Hawkins Hoffman, Stephen T Jackson, Trevor J Krabbenhoft, David J Lawrence, Douglas Limpinsel, Robert T Magill, Tracy A Melvin, John M Morton, Robert A Newman, Jay O Peterson, Mark T Porath, Frank J Rahel, Gregor W Schuurman, Suresh A Sethi, Jennifer L Wilkening

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 46 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 47 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2022.
All research outputs
#612,153
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#213
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,031
of 450,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.