You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using a full annual cycle model to evaluate long‐term population viability of the conservation‐reliant Kirtland's warbler after successful recovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12776 |
| Authors |
Donald J. Brown, Christine A. Ribic, Deahn M. Donner, Mark D. Nelson, Carol I. Bocetti, Christie M. Deloria‐Sheffield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,701,237
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,508
of 3,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,895
of 325,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#55
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.