↓ Skip to main content

Theory and methods for rare events

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique I, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Theory and methods for rare events
Published in
Journal de Physique I, March 2012
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2012-20366-2
Authors

S. Bonella, S. Meloni, G. Ciccotti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 23 34%
Chemistry 18 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#1,003
of 1,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,870
of 172,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.