You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reducing bias in trials due to reactions to measurement: experts produced recommendations informed by evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David P French, Lisa M Miles, Diana Elbourne, Andrew Farmer, Martin Gulliford, Louise Locock, Stephen Sutton, Jim McCambridge, MERIT Collaborative Group, Peter Bower, Stacy Clemes, Mark Conner, Ruth Dundas, Diana Elbourne, Sandra Eldridge, Andrew Farmer, David French, Carrol Gamble, Martin Gulliford, Frank Kee, Alastair Leyland, Louise Locock, Rebecca Lynch, Graeme MacLennan, Jim McCambridge, Lisa Miles, Samuel CS Rowley, Linda Sharples, Falko F Sniehotta, Claire Snowdon, Mirjam Sprangers, Stephen Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 37% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 27 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#848,416
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#215
of 4,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,674
of 454,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#8
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.