You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2048872616643053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francois Schiele, Chris P Gale, Eric Bonnefoy, Frederic Capuano, Marc J Claeys, Nicolas Danchin, Keith A A Fox, Kurt Huber, Zaza Iakobishvili, Maddalena Lettino, Tom Quinn, Maria Rubini Gimenez, Hans E Bøtker, Eva Swahn, Adam Timmis, Marco Tubaro, Christiaan Vrints, David Walker, Doron Zahger, Uwe Zeymer, Hector Bueno |
| Abstract |
Evaluation of quality of care is an integral part of modern healthcare, and has become an indispensable tool for health authorities, the public, the press and patients. However, measuring quality of care is difficult, because it is a multifactorial and multidimensional concept that cannot be estimated solely on the basis of patients' clinical outcomes. Thus, measuring the process of care through quality indicators (QIs) has become a widely used practice in this context. Other professional societies have published QIs for the evaluation of quality of care in the context of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but no such indicators exist in Europe. In this context, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) has reflected on the measurement of quality of care in the context of AMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)) and created a set of QIs, with a view to developing programmes to improve quality of care for the management of AMI across Europe. We present here the list of QIs defined by the ACCA, with explanations of the methodology used, scientific justification and reasons for the choice for each measure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Egypt | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 14% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#593,985
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
#43
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,304
of 328,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.