| Title |
Using patient reported outcome measures in health services: A qualitative study on including people with low literacy skills and learning disabilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepa Jahagirdar, Thilo Kroll, Karen Ritchie, Sally Wyke |
| Abstract |
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-report measures of health status increasingly promoted for use in healthcare quality improvement. However people with low literacy skills or learning disabilities may find PROMs hard to complete. Our study investigated stakeholder views on the accessibility and use of PROMs to develop suggestions for more inclusive practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,087,664
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,469
of 7,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,419
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#53
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.