↓ Skip to main content

Microwave ablation of malignant extremity bone tumors

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Microwave ablation of malignant extremity bone tumors
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3005-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing-Yu Fan, Yong Zhou, Minghua Zhang, Baoan Ma, Tongtao Yang, Hua Long, Zhe Yu, Zhao Li

Abstract

The current application of limb salvage process has some unsolved problems, such as prosthesis loosening, which severely limits the function of the preserved limbs. Innovative approaches are needed to further improve functional outcome. Instead of en-bloc resection of tumor-bearing bone, it is dissected from the surrounding normal tissues, followed by devitalizing the bone segment and the extra-cortical bulk by microwave induced hyperthermia in situ through the antenna array. From May 1999 to March 2012, 544 patients with malignant bone tumors of the extremities were treated by the novel method. The over 3-year survival rate was 59.1 % for high-grade malignancy, 88.7 % for low-grade malignancy. In the majority of the patients, cosmetic and useful limbs were preserved. Local recurrence rate was 9.8 % for the high grade malignancy (mainly occurred at the early stage of the research). The overall fracture rate was 2.6 %. Deep infection rate was 1.8 %. The complication rate is lower than the literature reports. After heat necrosis, the dead bone maintains both the osteoconduction and osteoinduction properties. The application of microwave induced hyperthermia for treatment of malignant bone tumors, except the late diagnosed cases who's tumor-bearing bone was destroyed too severe to do biological reconstruction, is an effective, simple, and inexpensive method. The oncological and functional results are encouraging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Engineering 3 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#935
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,435
of 343,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#120
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.