You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bleeding Risk and Management in Interventional Procedures in Chronic Liver Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gia A. DeAngelis, Rachita Khot, Ziv J Haskal, Hillary S. Maitland, Patrick G. Northup, Neeral L. Shah, Stephen H. Caldwell |
| Abstract |
The coagulopathy of liver disease is distinctly different from therapeutic anticoagulation in a patient. Despite stable elevated standard clot-based coagulation assays, nearly all patients with stable chronic liver disease (CLD) have normal or increased clotting. Common unfamiliarity with the limitations of these assays in CLD may lead to inappropriate and sometimes harmful interventions, including blood product transfusions before a procedure. Knowledge of the distinct hemostatic alterations in CLD can allow identification of the small subset of patients with clinically significant coagulopathy who can benefit from hematologic optimization before invasive procedures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 53% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Saint Martin (French part) | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,843,209
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#259
of 3,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,696
of 350,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.