↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge, attitude and practice of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus towards complementary and alternative medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Integrative Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge, attitude and practice of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus towards complementary and alternative medicine
Published in
Journal of Integrative Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/s2095-4964(16)60244-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sulaiman Al-Eidi, Salwa Tayel, Fatima Al-Slail, Naseem Akhtar Qureshi, Imen Sohaibani, Mohamed Khalil, Abdullah Mohammad Al-Bedah

Abstract

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is relatively common among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) around the world. Like many other countries, Saudi Arabia has a high incidence of T2DM, and incorporates the use of CAM in its treatment. This study explores the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of CAM therapies among patients with T2DM and explores the relationships between sociodemographics and the KAP of CAM modalities. This is a hospital-based, observational, cross-sectional study that selected 302 outpatients with T2DM, from Diabetic Center of King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Hospital, in Riyadh city, in May 2014. Patients were interviewed using a predesigned questionnaire. The mean age of patients was (51.6 ± 10.6) years and 43.4% of them were males. The prevalence of CAM practices was 30.5%; 30.39% of them used herbs, 20.58% used wet cupping and 17.64% used nutritional supplements and other therapies. The factors found to predict the use of CAM therapies among patients with T2DM were: age above 51 years, unemployment and the participants± knowledge about the effectiveness of CAM products. This preliminary study estimated the prevalence of CAM use, revealed positive attitude towards CAM and found three significant predictors of CAM use among patients with T2DM, which is consistent with regional data. A community-based research with a larger sample that targets T2DM population is needed in Saudi Arabia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 46 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 48 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,338,537
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Integrative Medicine
#278
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,794
of 298,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Integrative Medicine
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.