↓ Skip to main content

Expressed Emotion and behaviourally controlling interactions in the daily life of dyads experiencing psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expressed Emotion and behaviourally controlling interactions in the daily life of dyads experiencing psychosis
Published in
Psychiatry Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debora Vasconcelos e Sa, Alison Wearden, Samantha Hartley, Richard Emsley, Christine Barrowclough

Abstract

While research using Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM) suggests that, in general, contact with relatives or friends may be protective for psychotic experiences, contact with high-Expressed Emotion (high-EE) relatives can have adverse consequences for patients. This study investigated whether contact with high-EE relatives, and relatives' behaviourally controlling interactions (BCI) are related to patients' symptoms and to both patients' and relatives' affect when measured using structured diary assessments in the course of everyday life. Twenty-one patients experiencing psychosis and their closest relatives provided synchronized self-reports of symptoms (patients only), affect, dyadic contact and BCI over a 6-days period. Relatives' EE was obtained from Camberwell Family Interviews. Multi-level modeling showed that patients' reports of relatives taking control of them and helping them were associated with increased patient negative affect and symptoms. Relatives' self-reports of nagging, taking control and keeping an eye on the patient were related to fluctuations in relatives' affect. No evidence was found for the moderating effect of EE status on the association between dyadic contact and affect or, in the case of patients, symptoms. When measured using an ecologically valid methodology, momentary behaviourally controlling interactions within dyads experiencing psychosis can impact on patients' affect and symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research
#5,868
of 7,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,575
of 348,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research
#89
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.