↓ Skip to main content

On the use of databases about research performance: comments on Karlovčec and Mladenić (2015) and others using the SICRIS database

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
On the use of databases about research performance: comments on Karlovčec and Mladenić (2015) and others using the SICRIS database
Published in
Scientometrics, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-2073-4
Authors

Romina Rodela

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Librarian 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 27%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,784,610
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,780
of 2,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,241
of 355,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#40
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.