You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science, Maddá, and ‘Ilm: The language divide in scientific information available to Internet users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1177/09636625211022975 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kawther Zoubi, Aviv J. Sharon, Eyal Nitzany, Ayelet Baram-Tsabari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| Israel | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,443,468
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#179
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,056
of 437,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.