↓ Skip to main content

Influences on students’ career decisions concerning general practice: a focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Influences on students’ career decisions concerning general practice: a focus group study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x687049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Nicholson, Adrian Michael Hastings, Robert Kee McKinley

Abstract

Despite concerns about recruitment to UK general practice, there has been no concerted educational intervention to address them. To better understand how medical students' perceptions of their experiences of their undergraduate curriculum may affect choosing general practice as a career. Qualitative study comprising focus groups of a total of 58 students from a range of medical schools across the UK. A range of UK medical schools students were invited by email to participate in focus groups and return a questionnaire detailing their current career choice to facilitate sampling students with varied career preferences. Students late in their studies were sampled as they were likely to be considering future careers. Focus group discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and anonymised for both school and participant, then thematically analysed. Perceived differences in medical school culture, curriculum philosophy, design, and intent were explored. Six focus groups (58 students) were convened. Some student participants' career aspirations were strongly shaped by family and home, but clinical placements remained important in confirming or refuting these choices. High-quality general practice attachments are a powerful attractor to general practice and, when they reflect authentic clinical practice, promote general practice careers. GP tutors can be powerful, positive role models. Students' comments revealed conflicting understandings about general practice. Attracting rather than coercing students to general practice is likely to be more effective at changing their career choices. Early, high-quality, ongoing and, authentic clinical exposure promotes general practice and combats negative stereotyping. It is recommended that increasing opportunities to help students understand what it means to be a 'good GP' and how this can be achieved are created.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 50%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,415,295
of 24,609,626 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#685
of 4,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,778
of 343,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#20
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,609,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.