| Title |
The Role of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10911-006-9008-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel K. Chan, Mark E. Hill, William J. Gullick |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
#139
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,748
of 67,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.