↓ Skip to main content

歯科大学・大学歯学部における「障害児歯科」の教育と診療についての現況調査

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
歯科大学・大学歯学部における「障害児歯科」の教育と診療についての現況調査
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, December 2005
DOI 10.11411/jspd1963.43.5_571
Authors

鈴木 康生, 真柳 秀昭, 福田 理, 森主 宜延, 西川 康博, 田中 晃伸

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,564,966
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Dentistry
#9
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,865
of 160,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Pediatric Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them