You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative baseline of coral disease in three regions along the Saudi Arabian coast of the central Red Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0246854 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Greta Smith Aeby, Amanda Shore, Thor Jensen, Maren Ziegler, Thierry Work, Christian R. Voolstra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,721,242
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,112
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,301
of 439,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,063
of 2,786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.