↓ Skip to main content

Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
521 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience
Published in
Scientometrics, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
Authors

Ismael Rafols, Martin Meyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 7 2%
United States 7 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 359 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 24%
Researcher 73 18%
Student > Master 38 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 81 21%
Unknown 55 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 105 27%
Computer Science 66 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 40 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 71 18%
Unknown 77 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,279,346
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#678
of 2,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,813
of 112,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.