↓ Skip to main content

Itraconazole may increase the risk of early-onset bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Itraconazole may increase the risk of early-onset bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12185-012-1224-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norisato Hashimoto, Kenji Yokoyama, Ken Sadahira, Tomoki Ueda, Yuiko Tsukada, Shinichiro Okamoto

Abstract

Bortezomib (BOR) is an effective drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma and BOR-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) is a major adverse event. BIPN tends to occur after two or three cycles of treatment (late-onset BIPN), but may occur during the first treatment cycle (early-onset BIPN). BIPN severity was retrospectively assessed and graded in 48 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with BOR for the first time between June 2007 and February 2011 at Keio University Hospital. PN grade 2 or higher occurring within the first cycle of BOR was defined as early-onset severe BIPN. Early-onset severe BIPN occurred in 13 patients. Concomitant use of itraconazole [ITCZ: odds ratio (OR) 29.14 (3.02-281.56), p = 0.004] and a proton pump inhibitor [OR 9.00 (1.05-77.1), p = 0.04] were identified by univariate analysis, as risk factors for developing early-onset severe BIPN. Based on multivariate analysis, concomitant use of ITCZ was the only significant risk factor for developing early-onset severe BIPN [OR 19.00 (1.89-190.96), p = 0.01]. Concomitant use of ITCZ with BOR significantly increased the incidence of early-onset severe BIPN in our study population, suggesting that administration of ITCZ in patients receiving BOR should be avoided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Psychology 3 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,372,313
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#556
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,802
of 275,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.