↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Preservation and Extraction Methods on Five Taxonomically Disparate Coral Microbiomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Preservation and Extraction Methods on Five Taxonomically Disparate Coral Microbiomes
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.684161
Authors

Zoe A. Pratte, Christina A. Kellogg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Unspecified 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,270,669
of 23,750,517 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,170
of 9,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,621
of 438,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#156
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,750,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.