↓ Skip to main content

A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part II: second cancer risk estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part II: second cancer risk estimation
Published in
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00411-009-0231-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor Shuryak, Philip Hahnfeldt, Lynn Hlatky, Rainer K. Sachs, David J. Brenner

Abstract

As the number of cancer survivors grows, prediction of radiotherapy-induced second cancer risks becomes increasingly important. Because the latency period for solid tumors is long, the risks of recently introduced radiotherapy protocols are not yet directly measurable. In the accompanying article, we presented a new biologically based mathematical model, which, in principle, can estimate second cancer risks for any protocol. The novelty of the model is that it integrates, into a single formalism, mechanistic analyses of pre-malignant cell dynamics on two different time scales: short-term during radiotherapy and recovery; long-term during the entire life span. Here, we apply the model to nine solid cancer types (stomach, lung, colon, rectal, pancreatic, bladder, breast, central nervous system, and thyroid) using data on radiotherapy-induced second malignancies, on Japanese atomic bomb survivors, and on background US cancer incidence. Potentially, the model can be incorporated into radiotherapy treatment planning algorithms, adding second cancer risk as an optimization criterion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Other 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Physics and Astronomy 20 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,325,024
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#117
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,685
of 116,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.