| Title |
Generic ecological impact assessments of alien species in Norway: a semi-quantitative set of criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-012-0394-z |
| Authors |
Hanno Sandvik, Bernt-Erik Sæther, Tomas Holmern, Jarle Tufto, Steinar Engen, Helen E. Roy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 32% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,324,325
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#500
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,871
of 291,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.