↓ Skip to main content

Macro and trace mineral constituents and radionuclides in mushrooms: health benefits and risks

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
312 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Macro and trace mineral constituents and radionuclides in mushrooms: health benefits and risks
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00253-012-4552-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerzy Falandysz, Jan Borovička

Abstract

This article reviews and updates data on macro and trace elements and radionuclides in edible wild-grown and cultivated mushrooms. A huge biodiversity of mushrooms and spread of certain species over different continents makes the study on their multi-element constituents highly challenging. A few edible mushrooms are widely cultivated and efforts are on to employ them (largely Agaricus spp., Pleurotus spp., and Lentinula edodes) in the production of selenium-enriched food (mushrooms) or nutraceuticals (by using mycelia) and less on species used by traditional medicine, e.g., Ganoderma lucidum. There are also attempts to enrich mushrooms with other elements than Se and a good example is enrichment with lithium. Since minerals of nutritional value are common constituents of mushrooms collected from natural habitats, the problem is however their co-occurrence with some hazardous elements including Cd, Pb, Hg, Ag, As, and radionuclides. Discussed is also the problem of erroneous data on mineral compounds determined in mushrooms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 246 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 80 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 22%
Environmental Science 23 9%
Chemistry 15 6%
Engineering 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 91 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2013.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,748
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,011
of 284,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#35
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.