You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of evidence for germline RNF43 mutations in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome from a large multinational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel D Buchanan, Mark Clendenning, Li Zhuoer, Jenna R Stewart, Sharelle Joseland, Sonja Woodall, Julie Arnold, Kara Semotiuk, Melyssa Aronson, Spring Holter, Steven Gallinger, Mark A Jenkins, Kevin Sweet, Finlay A Macrae, Ingrid M Winship, Susan Parry, Christophe Rosty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,813,370
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#5,994
of 6,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,101
of 337,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#82
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.