| Title |
The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-006-0705-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. J. P. Biggs, R. G. Richards, N. Gadegaard, C. D. W. Wilkinson, M. J. Dalby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 36% |
| Researcher | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,719,611
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#106
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,278
of 160,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.