↓ Skip to main content

Vouchers and caseworkers in training programs for the unemployed

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Vouchers and caseworkers in training programs for the unemployed
Published in
Empirical Economics, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00181-012-0662-5
Authors

Ulf Rinne, Arne Uhlendorff, Zhong Zhao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Professor 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 52%
Psychology 3 14%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,914,401
of 23,607,611 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#113
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,934
of 280,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,607,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.