↓ Skip to main content

Determining the influence of environmental and patient specific factors on the polymicrobial communities of the cystic fibrosis airway

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Determining the influence of environmental and patient specific factors on the polymicrobial communities of the cystic fibrosis airway
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10482-012-9857-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Nelson, Audrey Perry, John D. Perry, Stephen J. Bourke, Stephen P. Cummings, Anthony De Soyza

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the polymicrobial communities in an adult Cystic Fibrosis population stratified by gender and the most common CFTR mutation, F508del. In this pilot study, DNA was extracted from sputum samples of 29 adult patients (16 male: 13 female) with an F508del mutation in a stable clinical state. Universal primers were used to amplify DNA from bacterial and fungal communities and the resulting fragments were analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Bacterial profiles showed a significant effect of gender (P = 0.046) and P. aeruginosa carriage (P = 0.034) on community structure. Bacterial communities were found to be randomly assembled. Fungal community analysis found that F508del homozygous patients had a greater diversity than heterozygous patients (P = 0.007). This study indicates that the bacterial lung communities of adult CF patients are randomly assembled but have distinct gender based differences. Furthermore, the fungal communities colonising the CF lung are more diverse in F508 homozygotes. This is the first paper to identify a reduced bacterial diversity in female patients with CF and to implicate more severe CFTR genotypes with increased risk of infection with multiple fungal species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Researcher 5 21%
Lecturer 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Linguistics 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,174,175
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,731
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,056
of 276,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.