↓ Skip to main content

Physical rehabilitation interventions in nonambulatory people with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical rehabilitation interventions in nonambulatory people with multiple sclerosis
Published in
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1097/mrr.0b013e32835a241a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine Toomey, Susan B. Coote

Abstract

There is an expanding body of research on exercise intervention for multidisciplinary rehabilitation of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Most of this research focuses on people with mild/moderate MS who are ambulatory. As the costs of care increases with increasing disability, it is important to evaluate the evidence for interventions in nonambulatory PwMS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding physical rehabilitation interventions in nonambulatory PwMS. The databases AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCHARTICLES were searched up to 31 May 2011. Reference lists, Google Scholar and PEDro were also searched. Trials of physical rehabilitation interventions in nonambulatory PwMS that analysed nonambulatory results separately were included. Pharmacological, surgical, medical and assistive device interventions were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed and the GRADE approach was used to classify the quality of evidence. Sixteen low-grade studies, only three of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were found. There are trends of improvement following some interventions such as cooling suits, respiratory training and multidisciplinary rehabilitation, but there is no high-grade evidence in terms of the benefits of interventions in this population. The effectiveness of physical rehabilitation interventions in nonambulatory PwMS remains unclear. Although trends in the results suggest positive benefits, conclusions cannot be drawn about the effectiveness of interventions in this population because of the small number and poor quality of studies. As approximately 25% of PwMS are nonambulatory and considerable costs are associated with their care, it is imperative that efforts be to increase the quality of evidence for nonambulatory PwMS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Sports and Recreations 11 13%
Psychology 10 11%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
#533
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,760
of 285,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.