↓ Skip to main content

LIS and BCIs: a Local, Pluralist, and Pragmatist Approach to 4E Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
LIS and BCIs: a Local, Pluralist, and Pragmatist Approach to 4E Cognition
Published in
Neuroethics, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12152-016-9267-6
Authors

Ruth Hibbert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Master 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 5 36%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,166,650
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,227
of 352,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.