You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009286.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gillian E Mead, Cheng‐Fang Hsieh, Rebecca Lee, Mansur A Kutlubaev, Anne Claxton, Graeme J Hankey, Maree L Hackett |
| Abstract |
Stroke is the major cause of adult disability. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been used for many years to manage depression. Recently, small trials have demonstrated that SSRIs might improve recovery after stroke, even in people who are not depressed. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are the least biased way to bring together data from several trials. Given the promising effect of SSRIs on stroke recovery seen in small trials, a systematic review and meta-analysis is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 25% |
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 18% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 21% |
| Unknown | 49 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 39% |
| Psychology | 34 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#804,449
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,530
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,394
of 192,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.