↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers in heart failure: a clinical review

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Biomarkers in heart failure: a clinical review
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10741-008-9123-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Paul Rocchiccioli, John J. V. McMurray, Anna F. Dominiczak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Other 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,475
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#227
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,746
of 166,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.