↓ Skip to main content

Balance Analysis Estimation of the Recovery of Radioactive Cesium from Ash

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Balance Analysis Estimation of the Recovery of Radioactive Cesium from Ash
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management, January 2016
DOI 10.3985/jjsmcwm.27.106
Authors

Okujou Iwami, Yasunori Sasai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,495,369
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,644
of 402,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them