↓ Skip to main content

Circumcision and Lifetime Risk of Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
49 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circumcision and Lifetime Risk of Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
The Journal of Urology, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Morris, Thomas E. Wiswell

Abstract

Urinary tract infection is common in infant males who are uncircumcised and can lead to renal parenchymal disease of the still growing pediatric kidney. Although the rate of urinary tract infection is highest in the first year of life, the cumulative incidence during the rest of the lifetime is under-recognized, but is expected to be nontrivial. Thus, any intervention that might prevent urinary tract infection would be expected to reduce suffering and medical costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#375,204
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#228
of 17,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,408
of 288,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#2
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.