↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting indigenous knowledge on tree fodder among Maasai pastoralists via a multi-method sequencing approach

Overview of attention for article published in Agriculture and Human Values, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Eliciting indigenous knowledge on tree fodder among Maasai pastoralists via a multi-method sequencing approach
Published in
Agriculture and Human Values, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10460-006-9057-6
Authors

Evelyne Kiptot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 39%
Environmental Science 18 24%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Computer Science 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Human Values
#495
of 888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,310
of 93,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Human Values
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.