Title |
Eliciting indigenous knowledge on tree fodder among Maasai pastoralists via a multi-method sequencing approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agriculture and Human Values, February 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10460-006-9057-6 |
Authors |
Evelyne Kiptot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 18 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Human Values
#495
of 888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,310
of 93,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Human Values
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.