↓ Skip to main content

Standardization of 99mTechnetium pyrophosphate imaging methodology to diagnose TTR cardiac amyloidosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Standardization of 99mTechnetium pyrophosphate imaging methodology to diagnose TTR cardiac amyloidosis
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12350-016-0610-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabahat Bokhari, Rachelle Morgenstern, Richard Weinberg, Mona Kinkhabwala, Demetrios Panagiotou, Adam Castano, Albert DeLuca, Andrew Kontak, Zhezhen Jin, Mathew S Maurer

Abstract

Technetium pyrophosphate ((99m)Tc-PYP) imaging to diagnose transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) has been increasingly utilized. The objective of this study is to provide a standardized (99m)Tc-PYP imaging protocol to diagnose ATTR-CA. 104 scans from 45 subjects with biopsy-proven ATTR-CA or light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL) were assessed. Multiple scans were obtained using different counts (750 vs 2000 K), times to acquisition (1 vs 2 to 4 hours), processing matrix (256 vs 128), and (99m)Tc-PYP dose. Image quality and extracardiac activity was assessed. Quantitative methods using heart-to-contralateral ratios (H/CL) and a visual semiquantitative scale were used to diagnose ATTR-CA.19 The correlation between H/CL ratios and reproducibility of semiquantitative visual scores, acquired using various imaging parameters, were evaluated. All imaging parameters had good to excellent image quality. 750 vs 2000 K counts, 1 hour acquisition and 256 matrix, had lower extracardiac activity (P = .00018). 10 mCi of (99m)Tc-PYP v. higher doses showed excellent image quality and less extracardiac activity (P = .0015). Correlation of H/CL ratios was strong (r ≥ 0.92) and reproducibility of semiquantitative visual scores was high (Kappa = 95%). An imaging protocol using 750 K counts, 10 mCi of (99m)Tc-PYP, and a 256 matrix was chosen as the standardized imaging protocol since it provided the shortest overall study time (1 vs 2 to 4 hours) and lowest radiation exposure (3 vs 8 to 10 mSv).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 55%
Computer Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,529,870
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#75
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,663
of 348,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.