You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised trial of the effect and cost-effectiveness of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: the Anglo Danish Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe) study
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3310/hta20640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca K Simmons, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Torsten Lauritzen, Guy Ehm Rutten, Annelli Sandbæk, Maureen van den Donk, James A Black, Libo Tao, Edward Cf Wilson, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Stephen J Sharp, Nicholas J Wareham, Simon J Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 278 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 90 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 92 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,492,157
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#265
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,702
of 381,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.