| Title |
Lung cancer risk at low cumulative asbestos exposure: meta-regression of the exposure–response relationship
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-012-0107-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sjoukje van der Bij, Hendrik Koffijberg, Virissa Lenters, Lützen Portengen, Karel G. M. Moons, Dick Heederik, Roel C. H. Vermeulen |
| Abstract |
Existing estimated lung cancer risks per unit of asbestos exposure are mainly based on, and applicable to, high exposure levels. To assess the risk at low cumulative asbestos exposure, we provide new evidence by fitting flexible meta-regression models, a notably new and more robust method. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 30% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 31% |
| Engineering | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#502
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,139
of 290,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.