↓ Skip to main content

Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn’t?

Overview of attention for article published in Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn’t?
Published in
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13246-016-0478-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie Trapp

Abstract

There are often differences in a publication's citation count, depending on the database accessed. Here, aspects of citation counts for medical physics and biomedical engineering papers are studied using papers published in the journal Australasian physical and engineering sciences in medicine. Comparison is made between the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Papers are categorised into subject matter, and citation trends are examined. It is shown that review papers as a group tend to receive more citations on average; however the highest cited individual papers are more likely to be research papers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 12 21%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Computer Science 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 16 28%