You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hypertension, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002922 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianfranco Parati, George S. Stergiou, Grzegorz Bilo, Anastasios Kollias, Martino Pengo, Juan Eugenio Ochoa, Rajiv Agarwal, Kei Asayama, Roland Asmar, Michel Burnier, Alejandro De La Sierra, Cristina Giannattasio, Philippe Gosse, Geoffrey Head, Satoshi Hoshide, Yutaka Imai, Kazuomi Kario, Yan Li, Efstathios Manios, Jonathan Mant, Richard J. McManus, Thomas Mengden, Anastasia S. Mihailidou, Paul Muntner, Martin Myers, Teemu Niiranen, Angeliki Ntineri, Eoin O’Brien, José Andres Octavio, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Stefano Omboni, Paul Padfield, Paolo Palatini, Dario Pellegrini, Nicolas Postel-Vinay, Agustin J. Ramirez, James E. Sharman, Andrew Shennan, Egle Silva, Jirar Topouchian, Camilla Torlasco, Ji Guang Wang, Michael A. Weber, Paul K. Whelton, William B. White, Giuseppe Mancia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,187,939
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hypertension
#111
of 4,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,856
of 434,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hypertension
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.