↓ Skip to main content

Antiepileptic drugs and bone metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Antiepileptic drugs and bone metabolism
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-3-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen A Valsamis, Surender K Arora, Barbara Labban, Samy I McFarlane

Abstract

Anti-epileptic medications encompass a wide range of drugs including anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, enzyme inducers or inhibitors, with a variety effects, including induction of cytochrome P450 and other enzyme, which may lead to catabolism of vitamin D and hypocalcemia and other effects that may significantly effect the risk for low bone mass and fractures. With the current estimates of 50 million people worldwide with epilepsy together with the rapid increase in utilization of these medications for other indications, bone disease associated with the use of anti-epileptic medications is emerging as a serious health threat for millions of people. Nevertheless, it usually goes unrecognized and untreated. In this review we discuss the pathophysiologic mechanisms of bone disease associated with anti-epileptic use, including effect of anti-epileptic agents on bone turnover and fracture risk, highlighting various strategies for prevention of bone loss and associated fractures a rapidly increasing vulnerable population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,002,336
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#495
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,107
of 88,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.