↓ Skip to main content

Auditory hallucinations in those populations that do not suffer from schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Auditory hallucinations in those populations that do not suffer from schizophrenia
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11920-007-0020-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Choong, M. D. Hunter, P. W. R. Woodruff

Abstract

The following article discusses the phenomenon of auditory hallucinations in those who do not suffer from schizophrenia. Research has shown the occurrence of auditory hallucinations in the general population to such an extent that they cannot be said to be pathognomonic of psychiatric illness. In addition, it has long been known that certain hallucinatory experiences occur in health, such as hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations. However, there are fundamental differences in the characteristics of these experiences. In the psychiatric population, these tend to be frequent, intrusive, and distressing. In contrast, in the nonclinical population, these are often predominantly positive and nonthreatening. The exact mechanism for the occurrence of auditory hallucinations is not yet known, but it is hoped that through the study of those in health, the mechanisms that underpin pathophysiologic processes in clinical conditions also can be elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,670,519
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#824
of 1,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,788
of 68,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.