You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Linear Regression and Adaptive Appearance Models for Fast Simultaneous Modelling and Tracking
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11263-010-0364-4 |
Authors |
Liam Ellis, Nicholas Dowson, Jiri Matas, Richard Bowden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 29% |
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 39 | 66% |
Engineering | 13 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,486,475
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#392
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,476
of 93,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.